UVA Logo
Give
This guide explores the intersection of the Open Access (OA) Movement and Information Justice.

Open Access and Information Justice

Inequality in the Academic Open Access Landscape

Inequality in the Academic Open Access Landscape

Oligarchification of Journals

Increasingly, academic journals (particularly those in the sciences) are controlled by a small number of publishers.

  • From the Springer Nature Annual Progress Report 2023, Springer owns:
      • the world’s largest fully OA journal, "Scientific Reports"  

      • more than 600 other fully OA journals across six imprint brands

    • more than 2,200 hybrid journals 

      • more than 30 "Nature" research journal

 

 

  • From this study (Larivière V, Haustein S, Mongeon P (2015) The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era. PLoS ONE 10(6): e0127502. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127502), published in 2013, it was demonstrated that an academic journal oligarchy was on the rise, and had been since the mid-1990s:
    • "This paper provides such analysis, based on 45 million documents indexed in the Web of Science over the period 1973-2013. It shows that in both natural and medical sciences (NMS) and social sciences and humanities (SSH), Reed-Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Springer, and Taylor & Francis increased their share of the published output, especially since the advent of the digital era (mid-1990s). Combined, the top five most prolific publishers account for more than 50% of all papers published in 2013. Disciplines of the social sciences have the highest level of concentration (70% of papers from the top five publishers), while the humanities have remained relatively independent (20% from top five publishers). NMS disciplines are in between, mainly because of the strength of their scientific societies, such as the ACS in chemistry or APS in physics"