Clinical Resources

Nurse Residency

Critical Appraisal

What Is It?

Critical appraisal is reviewing the evidence to determine the validity, reliability, and applicability of evidence to our practice. Simply finding the evidence is not the end of the process.

Think back to our step by step guide of EBP:

1. Spirit of inquiry and curiosity and supporting culture
2. Craft the clinical question using PICOT template
3. Search for the best evidence
4. Evaluate the evidence
5. Integrate the evidence with clinical expertise and patient preferences and values
6. Evaluate the outcomes of the clinical practice and decisions based on the evidence
7. Disseminate the EBP results

How do we do it?

Start by identifying the type of evidence you have -- that's the type of study you're evaluating: RCT, systematic review, cohort study, case study, etc. Once you know, you can use a checklist (see the list on the left) and start asking (and answering) questions.

It might seem like a difficult skill to cultivate, but it gets easier with practice. The goal is to think critically while reading and ask yourself:

  • Why was study done?
  • What is the sample size?
  • Are the instruments valid and reliable?
  • Are the statistical tests appropriate to the study design?
  • Are the conclusions drawn backed up by the data?

Guidelines for Evaluating

Read through this list as you go through your articles. Consider looking at them side by side, and marking or highlighting when you find (or don't find) these elements in your articles.

Title: should be clear, concise and convey the main concepts, hypotheses, methods and variables involved in the study.  Usually 12-15 words or a certain number of characters. 

Abstract: is the next most frequently read part of the article and will determine if a reader decides to read the entire article.  Usually 100-250 words that includes the purpose or aims, hypotheses, sample, methods and summary of results. 

Introduction: orients the reader to the subject and provides background (problem, evidence from other studies) on why this study is important.  Includes the aim and hypotheses for the study.  Where you may find the framework used to conduct the study. 

Methods: section describes how the study was done and provide enough information for a reader to replicate the study.  This section is key to determining the validity of the study.  Should describe the sample population and variables, instruments used to measure variables and their reliability and validity,  materials used, the study design, procedures and statistical tests to be used. 

Results: section provides all relevant statistical results including results that don’t support the hypotheses.  Usually will find tables and graphs that are meant to summarize findings and those also should be analyzed and critiqued. 

Discussion section analyzes the results in relation to the research question(s) and/or hypotheses.  Should make it clear if the hypotheses were supported.  If hypotheses are not supported what is a possible explanation for the unexpected results?  Should also discuss limitations of the study and recommendations for future study. 

References are listed and formatted according to the journal protocol.  Few scientific journals use APA.  All references listed in the body of the article must be included in the reference list.

Skip to main content

Claude Moore Health Sciences Library
1350 Jefferson Park Avenue P.O. Box 800722
Charlottesville, VA 22908 (Directions)

facebook twitter instagram
© 2018 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
Copyright & Privacy